Notes on How To Quantify the Diastolic Function of the Heart
Study for the Examination of Special Competence in Critical Care Echocardiography, (CCEeXAM®)
How is Grade II diastolic dysfunction diagnosed when the E/A ratio is normal?
-
When E/A is between 0.8 and 2.0, it’s not enough to determine grade II diastolic dysfunction.
-
You need at least 2 of these 3 findings:
-
E/e′ ratio >14
-
Left atrial volume index (LAVI) >34 mL/m²
-
Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) jet velocity >2.8 m/s
-
-
Meeting two or more means elevated left atrial pressure and grade II dysfunction.
What does a high E/A ratio (≥2) with reduced ejection fraction indicate?
-
An E/A ratio of 2.59 suggests a restrictive filling pattern.
-
In the context of reduced EF, this means Grade III diastolic dysfunction.
-
Indicates very elevated left atrial pressure.
How do you assess diastolic function in a patient with normal systolic function?
-
Use four criteria:
-
E/e′ >14
-
LAVI >34 mL/m²
-
TR velocity >2.8 m/s
-
Septal e′ <7 cm/s or lateral e′ <10 cm/s
-
-
If fewer than 2 of these are abnormal → normal diastolic function.
-
If 2 are abnormal → indeterminate.
-
If 3 or more are abnormal → diastolic dysfunction is present.
How do you assess diastolic function in atrial fibrillation?
-
Atrial contraction is lost, so E/A ratio can't be used.
-
Rely on other indicators:
-
Mitral deceleration time (DT) <160 ms
-
E/e′ ratio >11
-
IVRT <65 ms
-
Peak acceleration rate of mitral E >1900 cm/s²
-
What does a deceleration time <160 ms mean in atrial fibrillation?
-
Suggests elevated LV filling pressure.
-
Indicates diastolic dysfunction even in absence of a visible A-wave.
What if only limited diastolic parameters are available?
-
If only 2 criteria are available and just one is abnormal, you can still make a diagnosis.
-
In a patient with normal EF, if TR velocity is high and e′ is low → consistent with Grade I diastolic dysfunction.
How is moderate aortic stenosis defined?
-
Valve area between 1.0–1.5 cm²
-
Peak velocity 3.0–4.0 m/s
-
For example: valve area of 1.41 cm² and max velocity of 3.5 m/s = moderate AS.
How is aortic regurgitation severity assessed with pressure half-time?
-
Use the Bernoulli equation to calculate pressure from velocity.
-
Pressure half-time (PHT) <200 ms = severe AR.
-
Example: PHT of 180 ms supports severe aortic regurgitation.
How is mitral stenosis severity assessed with pressure half-time?
-
PHT >220 ms is consistent with severe mitral stenosis.
-
Example: PHT of 240 ms = severe MS.
How is pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) calculated?
-
PASP = Right atrial pressure + 4 × (TR velocity)²
-
If TR jet is 4.8 m/s and RA pressure is 15 mm Hg:
-
4 × 4.8² = 92
-
15 + 92 = 107 mm Hg PASP
-
How is pulmonary artery diastolic pressure calculated?
-
Use end-diastolic velocity of pulmonary regurgitation.
-
PADP = CVP + 4 × (velocity)²
-
If CVP is 8 mm Hg and velocity is 2 m/s:
-
4 × 2² = 16
-
8 + 16 = 24 mm Hg
-
How is paravalvular leak (PVL) graded after TAVR?
-
Based on percentage of valve circumference involved:
-
<10% = mild
-
10–30% = moderate
-
30% = severe
-
-
Aliasing outside the valve ring during diastole suggests PVL.
How do you calculate stroke volume across the aortic valve?
-
Use LVOT diameter and VTI:
-
SV = π × (radius)² × VTI
-
Example: SV = 58 mL
-
How do you calculate stroke volume across the mitral valve?
-
Use mitral annular diameter and VTI:
-
SV = π × (radius)² × VTI
-
Example: SV = 183 mL
-
How is mitral regurgitant volume calculated?
-
Regurgitant volume = SV (mitral) − SV (aortic)
-
Example: 183 mL − 58 mL = 125 mL
How is mitral regurgitant fraction calculated?
-
Regurgitant fraction = Regurgitant Volume / SV (mitral)
-
Example: 125 / 183 = 68%
-
50% = severe MR
How is effective regurgitant orifice area (EROA) calculated?
-
EROA = Regurgitant volume / VTI of MR jet
-
Example: 125 / 170 = 0.74 cm²
-
0.4 cm² = severe MR
How is aortic valve area calculated using the continuity equation?
-
AVA = (CSA of LVOT × velocity at LVOT) / velocity at AV
-
Example gives 0.68 cm² → severe AS
What if the AVA is severe but gradients are only moderate?
-
This mismatch suggests “low-flow aortic stenosis.”
-
EF is low → less flow → lower velocities and gradients.
-
Valve still severely stenotic based on area.
Why is there mismatch between AVA and gradients?
-
Low EF leads to reduced stroke volume and low transvalvular flow.
-
This falsely lowers the peak velocity and pressure gradient.
-
AVA remains small, showing true severity.
How is aortic regurgitation severity assessed using cardiac output?
-
Compare forward stroke volume (LVOT) and total stroke volume (RVOT).
-
Regurgitant volume = total − forward
-
If regurgitant volume <30 mL and regurgitant fraction <30%, it’s mild AR.